Real or fake?

A while ago I came across this in the TWAM collections and a glance at the documentation doesn’t give many clues. It’s a slightly dubious looking Egyptian artefact with poorly engraved hieroglyphs on the back of each figure and a repaired fracture on one side. I only looked at this in passing but thought it would be interesting to throw it out to you…

Poor quality 'Egyptian' statue depicting two females with incised hieroglyphics

Here are the hieroglyphs that run down the back of each of the figures…

Egyptian hieroglyphs are incised into the back of each figure

 

So, what do you think? Fancy having a go at translating the hieroglyphs?

Hieroglyphic conundrum

I have a great challenge for any hieroglyphic readers out there…

Two years ago I did some work on the coffins of Irtyru, one of the Great North Museum: Hancock mummies using infra-red photography (with the help of my colleague, Les Golding). In 1830, following the unwrapping of Irtyru’s mummy, shellac varnish was added to her mummified body and her coffins in an attempt at conservation. There is no doubt that many of the inscriptions and decorations on both her inner and outer coffins were already damaged, but this added an extra barrier for any attempt at analysis.

Below are images of one of the coffins in normal light, where you can make out some symbols and hieroglyphs, but not in any significant detail and using an infra-red filter.

Coffin of Irtyru photographed in normal lighting conditions

Coffin of Irtyru shown in infra-red light

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The aim was to see whether we would pick up anything more using this special filter that would allow us to examine the coffin in greater details and pick out some of the text that might give us an indication of how her name was written. It is interesting that we have always known this mummified female as ‘Irtyru’ but there is no documentation to support this presumption!

As a result, I present you with the following image as a starter for ten and ask any readers of hieroglyphs out there to see if they can make anything out… sadly my abilities are somewhat lacking in this area!

Detailed image of a section of Irtyru's coffin

Detailed image from the chest region of the coffin

More images coming soon!

Preparations for a new permanent gallery at Discovery Museum

Discovery Museum was recently awarded a grant from the government and The Wolfson Foundation charity to refurbish one of our permanent galleries. It was the second highest award given out across the country! Find out more here

 

Discovery Museum

Discovery Museum is already a major family attraction

Preparing for a new permanent gallery involves a lot of work from historical research, to sourcing images and film footage, working with individuals and community groups, choosing material from the museum and archive collections and liaising across the museum with lots of different teams. We want to keep people up to date with the project so will be blogging and tweeting every month about the latest behind the scenes developments. If you have any questions about the project we would love to hear them.

So what’s it all about?

 

Drawing entitled Newcastle upon Tyne, by the artist George Balmer, 1835 (c)

Drawing entitled Newcastle upon Tyne, by the artist George Balmer, 1835 (c)

The role played by Tyneside during the industrial growth of the 19th and 20th centuries is well documented. What is less well known is that by 1911 one third of the population were migrants or children of migrants, particularly from Ireland and Scotland.

Jobs in coal mining, shipbuilding and heavy engineering meant that the North East became a major centre of migration as people travelled from all over in search of a better way of life. This was a crucial period in the making of modern Tyneside. This project will explore the history of these people through personal, real-life stories and show how their culture and heritage have influenced the social and industrial development of Tyneside.

But the story does not end here; in the decade leading up to 2001 the North East has seen the second biggest rate of change in migration– 41% more people who were born abroad have made the region their home. This gallery will include the stories of these migrants too.  Juxtaposing contemporary stories with those of historical migrants will, it is hoped, lead to a new understanding that our cultural identity has always been open and changing.

 

Chinese Arch in Newcastle

Chinese Arch in Newcastle

Preliminary research into real life people has revealed some poignant stories that could feature in the gallery such as the story of Lena and Lewis Vineberg. Born in the 1850s in Russia they fled the country in the 1870s. In the 1881 census they are found on Russell Terrace in Newcastle. Lewis is recorded as a slipper maker and they have two small children. The family continued to grow. One of their sons, David, signed up to the Royal Air Corps in 1911. David married Annie Lukes and was a tailor in Newcastle. His tailor’s scissors are in the museum collection and the deed of name change document, David chose to change his name to the more English sounding ‘Vyner’, is in the Archives collection.

 

David Vyner

David Vyner in his tailor's shop in Newcastle

Don’t forget to come back to the blog to find out more about the stories that will feature in the gallery.

Pilgrim Street and the Newe House

The other day I was stood at the bus stop in Pilgrim Street, in front of the old Odeon, when the Number 1 bus to Slatyford suddenly transformed into a hay wain pulled by four oxen and two horses…

Well, in my head it did.  I was thinking of this wonderful view of that part of Newcastle, taken in about 1700 and currently in storage at the Laing Art Gallery:-  [click pictures for full-size images]

The artist has produced a bird’s eye view (from what would now be the roof of the old Odeon) looking out over Pilgrim Street and the Newe House towards Westgate Hill on the horizon.

The hay wain has probably just entered the town through Pilgrim Street Gate in the bottom right corner (on the site of the modern junction with Northumberland Street and Blackett Street) and is passing what’s now the Tyneside Cinema.

Further along the street, a train of loaded packhorses heading out of town is about to pass a coach-and-six at the gates of the Newe House.

Today, the packhorses would be passing the police station and the coach would be crossing Market Street.

The Newe House itself was an Elizabethan mansion built in 1580.  At one point during the Civil War, Charles I was held there under house arrest (well, when he wasn’t out playing golf on the Shield Field).  By 1700 it had acquired a couple of new wings and extensive formal gardens.

The house was demolished in the 1830s and today Lloyds TSB occupies part of the site.  Its tree-lined driveway lies buried under Market Street.

At the right of the picture, the town wall can be seen stretching from Pilgrim Street Gate to the New Gate and St Andrew’s Church in the distance.  Newcastle’s walls were still complete at this time and would be repaired one last time in 1745 in anticipation of a Jacobite attack.  This section of the wall gave its alignment to the modern Blackett Street.

The four horses in the field just outside the wall near the New Gate would today be galloping around Old Eldon Square, but the farm hands piling up the hay wain in the adjacent field would be lost under Boots and Waitrose in the shopping centre.

Pretty much everything in this view, town and country, was gone by the 1830s, swept away by Grainger and Dobson’s town of stone.

Better than JMW Turner? Thomas Girtin’s ‘Morpeth Bridge’ watercolour

Was Girtin a better watercolourist than JMW Turner? Turner himself seemed to say so – after his friend’s early death, Turner remarked,

If Tom Girtin had lived, I should have starved.

He was exaggerating wildly, of course, but Turner’s words show his admiration for the impressive effects Girtin achieved. The Laing’s watercolour of Morpeth Bridge shows how Girtin was able to transform an ordinary view into a scene filled with light, weather and drama. His innovative techniques and creation of atmospheric space put Girtin at the forefront of developments that subsequently made British watercolours famous.

‘Morpeth Bridge’ 1802, by Thomas Girtin (1775-1802). Watercolour, ink, pencil on paper, 52.9 cm x 32.1 cm, Laing Art Gallery, purchased 1979 with grant-aid from the Victoria and Albert Museum Purchase Fund, the Art Fund and the Wigham Richardson Bequest. D4812. CLICK to enlarge.

Girtin visited Morpeth in 1800 during a sketching tour of the north of England. He painted the Laing’s watercolour probably two years later. His picture shows the ancient stone bridge over the River Wansbeck, on the edge of the old town. Sunshine picks out the most important buildings – the bell-tower of the 13th-century Chapel of All Saints, on the left, and the later part of the Chapel, next to the bridge (together, they were known as Bridge Chantry). Although there’s no great cathedral or castle, the view would have had interest for collectors at the time, as the pioneering naturalist William Turner (1508-1568) attended the school in the old Chapel (it was a multi-purpose building – the chaplain also collected the tolls from users of the bridge.)

Old Morpeth Bridge from the river bank. CLICK image to enlarge.

I snapped this view from the top of the bank, peering between trees. At the time of Girtin’s visit, the view may well have been much more open, without those troublesome trees. The old bridge is now a footbridge (Chantry Footbridge) – the arches were removed about 30 years after Girtin visited, and a walkway added later. (It was damaged in the September floods this year, but has now been stabilized.) Trees now obscure much of the Chapel building behind the bridge, but it’s easier to see if you enlarge the photo. The fisherman standing in the river shows that it’s still (usually) as shallow as Girtin painted it. (The weir on the left was moved to this position about 29 years after Girtin’s visit, to enable water to be channelled to a new mill – the tall building on the far left.)

Distant view of old Morpeth Bridge from the river bank. CLICK image to enlarge.

This more distant viewpoint shows that Girtin’s watercolour view of the river and both banks was feasible. Since Girtin’s day, however, new buildings have been put up, including the church with a spire, and two mills on the left.

Chapel and river, detail of ‘Morpeth Bridge’ 1802, by Thomas Girtin. CLICK image to enlarge.

Girtin’s technique was very different to that of earlier artists, who had used blocks of grey for shaded areas, overlaid with thin, flat colour. When painting the buildings in this view, Girtin constantly varied the colour to recreate the effect of light through cloud on the stone. The attractively spontaneous quality of his painting method is evident in the blue brushstrokes dashed in around the bell-tower – they’re there to make the pale colour of the stone stand out more brightly. Paradoxically, Girtin’s picture is full of greys, but they’re complex hues mixed with blues and browns that give a rich and subtle effect against the pale gold stone and russet roofs of the buildings.

Sky and river, detail of ‘Morpeth Bridge’ 1802, by Thomas Girtin. CLICK image to enlarge

The sun shines brightly in Girtin’s picture, but it’s actually created just from bare paper, contrasted with the dark clouds. Girtin also initially left bare paper for the smoke and the tiny figures on the bridge, adding in little touches of colour to these areas after painting the sky.

Chapel and river, detail of ‘Morpeth Bridge’ 1802, by Thomas Girtin. CLICK image to enlarge

By layering transparent washes in shades of blue, grey and brown, Girtin was able to suggest the depth and transparency of the water. He created the shimmer of reflections by dragging dryish colour over the rough paper that he preferred to use. For an extra-bright gleam of light (behind the rider), Girtin scored through the paint with a sharp point to the paper below.

‘Morpeth Bridge’ 1802, by Thomas Girtin. CLICK image to enlarge.

Girtin used subtle colours to create harmony throughout his picture. At the same time, the resonant colours combined with light shining through threatening storm clouds create an emotional quality within the landscape.

Girtin greatly admired the pictures of Rembrandt, who composed landscape scenes in light and shade to create drama, while also ensuring a unified and balanced arrangement. As a very young man, Girtin copied Rembrandt prints during sketching evenings at the London home of art enthusiast Dr Thomas Monro. (For discussion of Rembrandt in relation to some of Girtin’s watercolours, see here and here.) The wide vista and weather-filled sky of Morpeth Bridge are features that Girtin also learnt from other Dutch landscape painters, such as Salomon Ruysdael and his nephew Jacob van Ruisdael. Their pictures were admired by many British 18th-century collectors and artists.

Girtin combined the examples of Dutch art with his own observation of landscape. In the later part of his career, he often went to great lengths to record the colours and atmosphere of a scene. The writer of his obituary in the Gentleman’s Magazine in 1803 gave the example of a sketch Girtin had painted:

…which was principally coloured on the spot where it was drawn, for he was so uncommonly indefatigable, that, when he had made a sketch of any place, he never wished to quit it until he had given it all the proper tints. This we particularly notice because it was generally supposed he was careless in taking his sketches, when, in fact, he was remarkably accurate in making them, though very careless of them after they were made.

Detail from John Wood’s ‘Plan of Morpeth’, 1826, University of Newcastle, Robinson Library. CLICK image to enlarge

No study for Girtin’s Morpeth Bridge seems to have survived (a small watercolour in the British Museum collection, dated 1800, seems to be an experiment in idealising the scene, and doesn’t have the verifiable detail that’s in the Laing’s watercolour.)

John Wood’s ‘Plan of Morpeth’ of 1826, shows that Girtin was pretty accurate. (The detail illustrated is from Wood’s map on the Tomorrow’s History website.) The buildings of varying heights in front of the old Chapel bell-tower in the watercolour are marked on Wood’s map just below the bridge on the left, next to the river. The Chapel and its extension are marked on the map in dark grey a little above these, and are numbered 6 and 7. On the right side of the map, just below the bridge, there are buildings in a right-angle around a triangle of land – this too corresponds to Girtin’s watercolour. (The weir is shown in its original position on the map – it was moved to allow a new road bridge to be built in 1829-34.)

So, presumably Girtin made an on-the-spot study, carefully painted but carelessly discarded, as the Gentleman’s Magazine, says he often did. It may have been a quite elaborate colour study such as he made for some other pictures.

Girtin’s Morpeth Bridge is part of a change in British watercolour painting towards focusing on light and weather in landscape. Girtin’s mastery of light and the emotional charge it created in his pictures would have particularly impressed his friend JMW Turner.

Thomas Girtin’s watercolour of Morpeth Bridge and another of his paintings will be on display at the Laing Art Gallery from October 20th to November 25th 2012. Two watercolours by JMW Turner will be on show at the same time, so come along and see which you prefer – Turner or Girtin. These pictures will be exhibited together with a watercolour by JR Cozens, whose art Girtin admired, and a scene by Peter de Wint, who continued Girtin’s innovations.

 *******************************************************

For further information on Girtin, see

Greg Smith, Thomas Girtin and the Art of Watercolour, Tate Gallery Publications, 2005.